🪷 Bhagavad-Gītā · 4.14

Chapter 4 · ज्ञानकर्मसंन्यासयोग · Jñāna-Karma-Sannyāsa-Yoga · "The Yoga of Knowledge & Action-Renunciation" · Verse 14 of 42

न मां कर्माणि लिम्पन्ति न मे कर्मफले स्पृहा।

इति मां योऽभिजानाति कर्मभिर्न स बध्यते।।4.14।।
— Bhagavad-Gītā 4.14 · Devanāgarī root text

🪷 English Translations

5 received English translations are available for this śloka. Each voice is labelled; no single rendering is presented as the Sanskrit itself.

Shri Purohit Swami · Poetic English · 1935 edition attribution in the received data
4.14 My actions do not fetter Me, nor do I desire anything that they can bring. He who thus realises Me is not enslaved by action.
Swami Sivananda · Direct prose · Divine Life Society
4.14 Actions do not taint Me, nor have I a desire for the fruit of actions. He who knows Me thus is not bound by actions.
Swami Gambīrānanda · Word-key glosses · Advaita Ashrama · Śaṅkara-school
4.14 Because of the absence of egoism, those karmani, actions; na limpanti, do not taint; mam, Me, by becoming the originators of body etc. And me, for Me; na sprha, there is no hankering for the results of those actions. But in the case of transmigrating beings, who have self-identification in the form, 'I am the agent', and thirst for actions as also for their results, it is reasonable that actions should taint them. Owing to the absence of these, actions do not taint Me. Anyone else, too, yah, who; abhijanati, knows; mam, Me; iti, thus, as his own Self, and (knows), 'I am not an agent; I have no hankering for the results of actions'; sah, he; na badhyate, does not become bound; karmabhih, by actions. In his case also actions cease to be the originators of body etc. This is the import.
Swami Ādidevānanda · Śrī-Vaiṣṇava perspective · Rāmānuja school
4.14 These actions of varied nature like creation etc., do not contaminate Me i.e., do not bind Me. For the distinctions of gods, men etc., are not brought about by Me, but by the particular Karmas, good and evil, of created beings. Therefore by the process of discriminating between the acired and the inherent, it will be found that I am not the author of this varied creations etc. The created or embodied selves, who are endowed with bodies and organs at the time of creation in accordance with their own Karmas springing from attachment to fruits etc., experience all enjoyments available in creation. Thus for them (embodied selves) alone there is desire for the results of creation etc., and for the results of their Karmas. There is no desire in Me for it. The Sutrakara says to the same effect: 'No partiality or cruelty on account of there being dependence (on the Karma of souls for inealities' (Br. S., 2.1.34). Bhagavan Parasara also says so: 'He (the Lord) is only the operative cause in the creation of beings. That from which the creative forces spring constitutes the material cause. Leaving aside the material cause, the being that becomes embodied does not reire the help of any other thing whatever. A thing is led into the condition in which it is, O best of ascetics, only by its own potentiality' (V. P., 1.4.51-2). The Supreme Person is only the operative cause with regard to the creation of those to be created, i.e., the selves in the bodies of gods etc. The material cause for the differences into gods etc., is the potentiality in the form of previous Karmas of the selves to be created. Therefore, leaving aside the operative cause, i.e., the Supreme Person, the creator, the embodied beings do not reire anything else for causing difference into conditions of gods etc. For these selves are led to take the forms of gods etc., by the potentiality of their own old Karma with which they are connected. Such is the meaning. He who knows Me thus to be the agent of creation etc., and still a non-agent, i.e., as one who has no desire for the results of the acts of creation etc., - such a person is not tied by previous actions, i.e., he is freed from the old Karmas which obstruct the undertaking of Karma Yoga by causing attachment to results. Such is the purport.
Dr. S. Sankaranarayan · Academic precision · modern scholarly
4.14. Actions do not stain Me; nor do I have a desire for the fruits [of actions] also. Whosoever comprehends Me as such, he is not bound by actions.

🪷 Hindi Translation · हिन्दी अनुवाद

Received Hindi rendering attributed in the source data to Swami Rāmsukhdās ji.

🪷 Swami Rāmsukhdās · Hindi rendering · source-data attribution
।।4.13 -- 4.14।। मेरे द्वारा गुणों और कर्मोंके विभागपूर्वक चारों वर्णोंकी रचना की गयी है। उस-(सृष्टि-रचना आदि-) का कर्ता होनेपर भी मुझ अव्यय परमेश्वरको तू अकर्ता जान। कारण कि कर्मोंके फलमें मेरी स्पृहा नहीं है, इसलिये मुझे कर्म लिप्त नहीं करते। इस प्रकार जो मुझे तत्त्वसे जान लेता है, वह भी कर्मोंसे नहीं बँधता।

🪷 English Commentaries · The Ācārya Voices

5 received English commentary layers are available for this śloka. Open only the voice you wish to study.

Swami Sivananda · Verse-by-verse word-keys with Sanskrit anchors
4.14 न not? माम् Me? कर्माणि actions? लिम्पन्ति taint? न not? मे to Me? कर्मफले in the fruit of actions? स्पृहा desire? इति thus? माम् Me? यः who? अभिजानाति knows? कर्मभिः by actions? न not? सः he? बध्यते is bound.Commentary As I have neither egoism nor desire for fruits? I am not bound by actions. Wordly people think they are the agents and they perfrom actions. They also expect fruits for their actions. So they take birth again and again. If one works without attachment? without egoism? without expectation of fruits? he too will not be bound by actions. He will be freed from birth and death. (Cf.IX.9).
Swami Gambīrānanda · Advaita-school commentary (Śaṅkara tradition)
4.14 Because of the absence of egoism, those karmani, actions; na limpanti, do not taint; mam, Me, by becoming the originators of body etc. And me, for Me; na sprha, there is no hankering for the results of those actions. But in the case of transmigrating beings, who have self-identification in the form, 'I am the agent', and thirst for actions as also for their results, it is reasonable that actions should taint them. Owing to the absence of these, actions do not taint Me. Anyone else, too, yah, who; abhijanati, knows; mam, Me; iti, thus, as his own Self, and (knows), 'I am not an agent; I have no hankering for the results of actions'; sah, he; na badhyate, does not become bound; karmabhih, by actions. In his case also actions cease to be the originators of body etc. This is the import.
Swami Ādidevānanda · Rāmānuja Śrī-Vaiṣṇava commentary
4.14 These actions of varied nature like creation etc., do not contaminate Me i.e., do not bind Me. For the distinctions of gods, men etc., are not brought about by Me, but by the particular Karmas, good and evil, of created beings. Therefore by the process of discriminating between the acired and the inherent, it will be found that I am not the author of this varied creations etc. The created or embodied selves, who are endowed with bodies and organs at the time of creation in accordance with their own Karmas springing from attachment to fruits etc., experience all enjoyments available in creation. Thus for them (embodied selves) alone there is desire for the results of creation etc., and for the results of their Karmas. There is no desire in Me for it. The Sutrakara says to the same effect: 'No partiality or cruelty on account of there being dependence (on the Karma of souls for inealities' (Br. S., 2.1.34). Bhagavan Parasara also says so: 'He (the Lord) is only the operative cause in the creation of beings. That from which the creative forces spring constitutes the material cause. Leaving aside the material cause, the being that becomes embodied does not reire the help of any other thing whatever. A thing is led into the condition in which it is, O best of ascetics, only by its own potentiality' (V. P., 1.4.51-2). The Supreme Person is only the operative cause with regard to the creation of those to be created, i.e., the selves in the bodies of gods etc. The material cause for the differences into gods etc., is the potentiality in the form of previous Karmas of the selves to be created. Therefore, leaving aside the operative cause, i.e., the Supreme Person, the creator, the embodied beings do not reire anything else for causing difference into conditions of gods etc. For these selves are led to take the forms of gods etc., by the potentiality of their own old Karma with which they are connected. Such is the meaning. He who knows Me thus to be the agent of creation etc., and still a non-agent, i.e., as one who has no desire for the results of the acts of creation etc., - such a person is not tied by previous actions, i.e., he is freed from the old Karmas which obstruct the undertaking of Karma Yoga by causing attachment to results. Such is the purport.
Dr. S. Sankaranarayan · Modern academic scholarship
4.13-14 Catur-varnyam etc. Na mam etc. How can there be taint of actions in Me Who remain like the ether ? The comparison with ether is due to the absence of desire [in both]. As such etc. : whosoever, with this sort of thought, takes refuge in the Bhagavat i.e. contemplates everywhere at all times on the Bliss-dense Supreme Lord as 'There exits nothing othe than Vasudeva [the Absolute]' - for him can there be any bondage by actions ?
Swami Chinmayānanda · Chinmaya Mission · modern Vedantic teaching
।।4.14।। नित्य शुद्ध और परिपूर्ण आत्मा को किसी प्रकार की अपूर्णता का भान नहीं हो सकता जो किसी इच्छा को जन्म दे। इस दृष्टि से श्रीकृष्ण भगवान् कहते हैं कर्म मुझे दूषित नहीं कर सकते और न मुझे कर्मफल में कोई आसक्ति ही है। इच्छा अथवा कर्म का बन्धन जीवअहंकार के लिये ही हो सकता है। मन और बुद्धि की उपाधियों से युक्त चैतन्य आत्मा ही जीव कहा जाता है। इन उपाधियों के दोषयुक्त होने पर जीव ही दूषित हुआ समझा जाता है। इसे एक दृष्टान्त के द्वारा हम भली भांति समझ सकेंगे।यदि किसी पात्र में रखे जल में सूर्य प्रतिबिम्वित होता है तो उस प्रतिबिम्ब की स्थिति पूर्णतया उस जल की स्थिति पर निर्भर करती है। जल के शान्त अस्थिर अथवा मैले होने पर वह प्रतिबिम्ब भी स्थिर क्षुब्ध अथवा धुंधला दिखाई देगा। परन्तु महाकाश स्थित वास्तविक सूर्य पर इस चंचलता अथवा निश्चलता का कोई प्रभाव नहीं पड़ेगा। इसी प्रकार इच्छा आसक्ति आदि का प्रभाव अहंकार पर ही पड़ता है। नित्य मुक्त चैतन्य स्वरूप आत्मा इन सबसे किसी प्रकार भी दूषित नहीं होती।आत्मविकास की वैदिक साधना का यह अर्थ नवीन प्रतीत होता है। क्या इसके पूर्व किसी ने इसका आचरण किया था उत्तर है

🪷 Hindi Vyākhyā · हिन्दी व्याख्या

Received Hindi vyākhyā attributed in the source data to Swami Rāmsukhdās ji.

🪷 Swami Rāmsukhdās · Hindi vyākhyā · source-data attribution
4.14।। व्याख्या--'चातुर्वर्ण्यं' (टिप्पणी प0 235.1) 'मया सृष्टं गुणकर्मविभागशः'--पूर्वजन्मोंमें किये गये कर्मोंके अनुसार सत्त्व, रज और तम--इन तीनों गुणोंमें न्यूनाधिकता रहती है। सृष्टि-रचनाके समय उन गुणों और कर्मोंके अनुसार भगवान् ब्राह्मण, क्षत्रिय, वैश्य और शूद्र--इन चारों वर्णोंकी रचना करते हैं (टिप्पणी प0 235.2)। मनुष्यके सिवाय देव, पितर, तिर्यक् आदि दूसरी योनियोंकी रचना भी भगवान् गुणों और कर्मोंके अनुसार ही करते हैं। इसमें भगवान्की किञ्चिन्मात्र भी विषमता नहीं है।'चातुर्वर्ण्यम्' पद प्राणिमात्रका उपलक्षण है। इसका तात्पर्य है कि मनुष्य ही चार प्रकारके नहीं होते, अपितु पशु, पक्षी, वृक्ष आदि भी चार प्रकारके होते हैं; जैसे--पक्षियोंमें कबूतर आदि ब्राह्मण, बाज आदि क्षत्रिय, चील आदि वैश्य और कौआ आदि शूद्र पक्षी हैं। इसी प्रकार वृक्षोंमें पीपल आदि ब्राह्मण, नीम आदि क्षत्रिय, इमली आदि वैश्य और बबूल (कीकर) आदि शूद्र वृक्ष हैं। परन्तु यहाँ 'चातुर्वर्ण्यम्' पदसे मनुष्योंको ही लेना चाहिये; क्योंकि वर्ण-विभागको मनुष्य ही समझ सकते हैं और उसके अनुसार कर्म कर सकते हैं। कर्म करनेका अधिकार मनुष्यको ही है। चारों वर्णोंकी रचना मैंने ही की है--इससे भगवान्का यह भाव भी है कि एक तो ये मेरे ही अंश हैं; और दूसरे, मैं प्राणिमात्रका सुहृद् हूँ, इसलिये मैं सदा उनके हितको ही देखता हूँ। इसके विपरीत ये न तो देवताके अंश हैं और न देवता सबसे सुहृद् ही हैं। इसलिये मनुष्यको चाहिये कि वह अपने वर्णके अनुसार समस्त कर्तव्य-कर्मोंसे मेरा ही पूजन करे (गीता 18। 46)।

🪷 Place in the Bhagavad-Gītā

← Previous verse · BG 4.13Adhyāya 4Next verse · BG 4.15 →
📚 Cite this verse · Academic citation formats
APA: Vyāsa Maharṣi. (n.d.). Bhagavad-Gītā 4.14. Vidhyāmitra. Retrieved 2026-08-17, from https://vidhyamitra.com/bhagavad-gita/4/14
Chicago: Vyāsa Maharṣi. "Bhagavad-Gītā 4.14." Vidhyāmitra. Accessed 2026-08-17. https://vidhyamitra.com/bhagavad-gita/4/14.
MLA: Vyāsa Maharṣi. "Bhagavad-Gītā 4.14." Vidhyāmitra, 2026, https://vidhyamitra.com/bhagavad-gita/4/14.
Canonical reading URL: https://vidhyamitra.com/bhagavad-gita/4/14. This citation identifies Vidhyamitra's received digital witness; consult a named scholarly or printed edition when edition-specific authority is required.

Continue the Pāṭha

Source and edition boundary

This page is rendered from the pinned 701-address witness documented on the Gītā index. Publication and search-indexing authorization for every bundled translation and commentary layer was confirmed on 4 August 2026; the exact received recension boundary remains disclosed separately.

🪷 ॐ नमो भगवते वासुदेवाय 🪷

सर्वम् कृष्णार्पणम् — this verse is one maṇi (jewel) on Krishna's thread (BG 7.7)