Computational Model Boundary

Computability · calibration · uncertainty · source discipline

कालः कलयतामहम्
BG 10.30 gives the devotional orientation. It does not remove the engineering duty to distinguish a model result from empirical or historical proof.

The central truth

Vidhyamitra implements a deterministic analytical astronomical model. Its ability to return a value for a proleptic date proves computational reach, not historical uniqueness or physical accuracy at arbitrary depth. Every result must be read with the declared model, calibration range, uncertainty, and source boundary.

Live deterministic fixtures

These rows prove that the current implementation returns deterministic values for declared inputs. They do not certify that an ancient event occurred on any sampled date.

FixtureYearAhargaṇaSunMoonBoundary
Synthetic deep-time fixture-10000-2,519,735KanyāMithunaModel-output demonstration only; not an asserted historical sky.
Modern historical fixture19001,826,556DhanuDhanuDeterministic regression fixture; independent accuracy comparison is a separate gate.
J2000-era fixture20001,863,080DhanuTulāDeterministic regression fixture near a common astronomical epoch.
Contemporary fixture20261,872,698MeṣaTulāCurrent-era model-output demonstration.

Mathematical lineage

What Vidhyamitra does not infer

How to read sacred chronology

Keep root text, literal grammar, traditional commentary, model-derived output, and modern historical inference distinct. Vidhyamitra preserves the source corpora and devotional doorway while declining to manufacture an exact sacred birth date from its own software.

Krishna as Kāla is the devotional orientation of this work. Verification remains an engineering discipline: model output, textual tradition, historical inference, and empirical accuracy are separate layers.

कालः कलयतामहम् · सत्यं वद · धर्मं चर