🪷 Bhagavad-Gītā · 2.29

Chapter 2 · सांख्ययोग · Sāṅkhya-Yoga · "The Yoga of Knowledge" · Verse 29 of 72

← BG 2.28↑ Chapter 2 hub · Bhagavad-Gītā indexBG 2.30 →
आश्चर्यवत्पश्यति कश्चिदेन

माश्चर्यवद्वदति तथैव चान्यः।

आश्चर्यवच्चैनमन्यः श्रृणोति

श्रुत्वाप्येनं वेद न चैव कश्चित्।।2.29।।
Bhagavad-Gītā 2.29 · the yathārtha śloka (Devanāgarī Sanskrit · canonical)

🪷 English Translations

Five authentic English voices · each from a distinct sampradāya · together revealing the verse's full śabda-tattva.

Shri Purohit Swami · Poetic English · 1935 · public domain · Cosmo Press tradition
2.29 One hears of the Spirit with surprise, another thinks It marvellous, the third listens without comprehending. Thus, though many are told about It, scarcely is there one who knows It.
Swami Sivananda · Direct prose · Divine Life Society
2.29 One sees This (the Self) as a wonder; another speaks of It as a wonder; another hears of It as a wonder; yet having heard, none understands It at all.
Swami Gambīrānanda · Word-key glosses · Advaita Ashrama · Śaṅkara-school
2.29 'This Self under discussion is inscrutable. Why should I blame you alone regarding a thing that is a source of delusion to all!' How is this Self inscrutable? [It may be argued that the Self is the object of egoism. The answer is: Although the individualized Self is the object of egoism, the absolute Self is not.] This is being answered in, 'Someone visualizes It as a wonder,' etc. Kascit, someone; pasyati, visualizes; enam, It, the Self; ascaryavat, as a wonder, as though It were a wonder a wonder is something not seen before, something strange, something seen all on a sudden; what is comparable to that is ascarya-vat; ca, and; tatha, similarly; eva, indeed; kascit, someone; anyah, else; vadati, talks of It as a wonder. And someone else srnoti, hears of It as a wonder. And someone, indeed, na, does not; veda, realize It; api, even; srutva, after hearing, seeing and speaking about It. Or, (the meaning is) he who sees the Self is like a wonder. He who speaks of It and the who hears of It is indeed rare among many thousands. Therefore, the idea is that the Self is difficult to understand. Now, in the course of concluding the topic under discussion, [viz the needlessness of sorrow and delusion,from the point of view of the nature of things.] He says, 'O descendant of Bharata, this embodied Self', etc.
Swami Ādidevānanda · Śrī-Vaiṣṇava perspective · Rāmānuja school
2.29 Among innumerable beings, someone, who by great austerity has got rid of sins and has increased his merits, realises this self possessing the above mentioned nature, which is wonderful and distinct in kind from all things other than Itself. Such a one speaks of It to another. Thus, someone hears of It. And even after hearing of It, no one knows It exactly that It really exists. The term 'ca' (and) implies that even amongst the seers, the speakers and hearers, one with authentic percepetion, authentic speech and authentic hearing, is a rarity.
Dr. S. Sankaranarayan · Academic precision · modern scholarly
2.29. This someone observes as a wonder; similarly another speaks of This as a wonder; another hears This as a wonder; but even after hearing, not even one understands This.

🪷 English Commentaries · The Ācārya Voices

The classical commentary tradition rendered in English · each ācārya speaks from their own sampradāya · the seer chooses the depth of darśana.

Swami Sivananda · Verse-by-verse word-keys with Sanskrit anchors
2.29 आश्चर्यवत् as a wonder? पश्यति sees? कश्चित् sone one? एनम् this (Self)? आश्चर्यवत् as a wonder? वदति speaks of? तथा so? एव also? च and? अन्यः another? आश्चर्यवत् as a wonder? च and? एनम् this? अन्यः another? श्रृणोति hears? श्रुत्वा having heard? अपि even? एनम् this? वेद knows? न not? च and? एव also? कश्चित् any one.Commentary The verse may also be interpreted in this manner. He that sees? hears and speaks of the Self is a wonderful man. Such a man is very rare. He is one among many thousands. Thus the Self is very hard to understand.
Swami Gambīrānanda · Advaita-school commentary (Śaṅkara tradition)
2.29 'This Self under discussion is inscrutable. Why should I blame you alone regarding a thing that is a source of delusion to all!' How is this Self inscrutable? [It may be argued that the Self is the object of egoism. The answer is: Although the individualized Self is the object of egoism, the absolute Self is not.] This is being answered in, 'Someone visualizes It as a wonder,' etc. Kascit, someone; pasyati, visualizes; enam, It, the Self; ascaryavat, as a wonder, as though It were a wonder a wonder is something not seen before, something strange, something seen all on a sudden; what is comparable to that is ascarya-vat; ca, and; tatha, similarly; eva, indeed; kascit, someone; anyah, else; vadati, talks of It as a wonder. And someone else srnoti, hears of It as a wonder. And someone, indeed, na, does not; veda, realize It; api, even; srutva, after hearing, seeing and speaking about It. Or, (the meaning is) he who sees the Self is like a wonder. He who speaks of It and the who hears of It is indeed rare among many thousands. Therefore, the idea is that the Self is difficult to understand. Now, in the course of concluding the topic under discussion, [viz the needlessness of sorrow and delusion,from the point of view of the nature of things.] He says, 'O descendant of Bharata, this embodied Self', etc.
Swami Ādidevānanda · Rāmānuja Śrī-Vaiṣṇava commentary
2.29 Among innumerable beings, someone, who by great austerity has got rid of sins and has increased his merits, realises this self possessing the above mentioned nature, which is wonderful and distinct in kind from all things other than Itself. Such a one speaks of It to another. Thus, someone hears of It. And even after hearing of It, no one knows It exactly that It really exists. The term 'ca' (and) implies that even amongst the seers, the speakers and hearers, one with authentic percepetion, authentic speech and authentic hearing, is a rarity.
Dr. S. Sankaranarayan · Modern academic scholarship
2.39 Ascaryavat etc. But, if this Self is, in this manner, changeless (or destructionless), why is This not observed just as such by all ? It is so because, as if by a rare chance, only some one observes [This]. Even after listening, not even one understands This i.e., realises This.
Swami Chinmayānanda · Chinmaya Mission · modern Vedantic teaching
।।2.29।। परमार्थ तत्त्व का वर्णन करते हुए कहा जाता है कि वह अनन्त सर्वज्ञ और आनन्दस्वरूप है जबकि हमारा अपने ही विषय में अनुभव यह है कि हम परिच्छिन्न अज्ञानी और दुखी हैं। इस प्रकार जो हमारा वास्तविक आत्मस्वरूप है उससे सर्वथा भिन्न हमारा प्रत्यक्ष अनुभव है। पारमार्थिक स्वरूप और प्रत्यक्ष अनुभव इन दोनों का अन्तर शीत और उष्ण प्रकाश और अंधकार के अन्तर के समान प्रतीत हो रहा है। क्या कारण है कि हम अपने शुद्ध आत्मस्वरूप का साक्षात् अनुभव नहीं कर पाते हैं अज्ञान अवस्था में जब हम सत्य को जानना चाहते हैं तब हमारी यह धारणा होती है कि वह सत्य एक ऐसा लक्ष्य है जो कहीं दूर स्थान में स्थित है जिसकी प्राप्ति किसी काल विशेष में ही होगी। परन्तु यदि हम भगवान के उपदेश पर विश्वास करें तो यह ज्ञात होगा कि हम उस सत्य से कभी भी दूर नहीं हैं क्योंकि वह तो हमारा स्वरूप ही है। एक र्मत्य जीव अमरत्व से उतना ही दूर है जितना कि स्वप्नद्रष्टा जाग्रत पुरुष से।जो मनुष्य अपने आत्मस्वरूप के वैभव के प्रति जागरूक है वही ईश्वर है और स्वस्वरूप के वैभव से विस्मृत ईश्वर ही मोहित जीव हैप्रथम तो इस जीव को शरीर मन और बुद्धि के परे स्थित आत्मा के अस्तित्व के विचार को ही समझना कठिन होता है और जब वह आत्मविकास की साधना का अभ्यास करके अपने आनन्दस्वरूप को पहचानता है तब वह उस इन्द्रियातीत अनन्त आनन्दस्वरूप का अनुभव कर आश्चर्यचकित रह जाता है।आश्चर्य की भावना जब मन में उठती है तब उसमें यह सार्मथ्य होती है कि क्षण भर के लिए आश्चर्यचकित व्यक्ति को और कुछ सूझता ही नहीं और वह उस क्षण उस भावना के साथ तदाकार हो जाता है। प्रयोग के तौर पर आप किसी व्यक्ति को अचानक आश्चर्यचकित कर दें और फिर उसके मुख के भावों को देखें। मुँह खुला हुआ कुछ न देखती हुई बाहर निकली हुई आँखें प्रत्येक शिरा तनाव से खिंची हुई वह व्यक्ति पुतले के समान क्षण भर के लिए अपने ही स्थान पर किंकर्त्तव्य विमूढ़ खड़ा रह जाता है।इसी प्रकार आत्मानुभव का भी वह आनन्द है जब आत्मा ही आत्मा के साथ आत्मा में ही रमण कर रही होती है। और इसीलिए महान ऋषियों ने इस अनुभव को आश्चर्य शब्द से सूचित किया जब अहंकार जीव समाप्त होकर शुद्ध अनन्तस्वरूप मात्र रह जाता है।अज्ञानी पुरुष समझता है कि मैं शरीर हूँ जिसमें आत्मा का वास है परन्तु ज्ञानी पुरुष जानता है कि मैं आत्मा हूँ जिसने शरीर धारण किया है । जो साधक सम्यक् प्रकार से इस उपदेश का श्रवण करते हैं उनको आगे उसी पर मनन करने को उत्साहित किया जाता है और तत्पश्चात् जब तक यथार्थ में आत्मसाक्षात्कार नहीं हो जाता तब तक उसके लिए ध्यान करने का उपदेश किया गया है। इस श्लोक से अज्ञानी पुरुष को भी श्रवण मनन और निदिध्यासन के द्वारा इस विरले प्रकार के श्रेष्ठ ज्ञान को प्राप्त करने की प्रेरणा मिल सकती है। आत्मतत्त्व को विषय के रूप में नहीं जाना जा सकता। इसीलिए यहाँ कहा गया है कि इसको सुनकर कोई भी व्यक्ति इसे नहीं जानता।अगले श्लोक में इस प्रकरण का उपसंहार करते हुए भगवान् कहते हैं

🪷 Place in the Bhagavad-Gītā

← Previous verse · BG 2.28Next verse · BG 2.30 →

🪷 ॐ नमो भगवते वासुदेवाय 🪷

सर्वम् कृष्णार्पणम् — this verse is one maṇi (jewel) on Krishna's thread (BG 7.7)